


Desire Literacy
for Big Tech
& AI
Solving the
AI Erotica Problem
Ethically integrate erotica and the truth of human desire into AI and big tech
Artemisia de Vine is the first person to crack how sexual fantasies actually work — and create the framework Big Tech needs to ethically and effectively integrate erotica, cognitive intimacy, and human desire into AI, LLMs, VR/AR, gaming, robotics, and emerging tech.
Every major AI company is about to enter the erotic arena whether they want to or not.
If your model:
-
talks to people
-
listens to people
-
comforts people
-
fantasises with people
-
generates people
-
remembers people
…it already lives inside the architecture of desire.
This is not optional.
Erotic intelligence is human intelligence.
Any system interacting with humans must be able to navigate desire.
You can do it blindly — or you can do it with the only map that exists.
If you are integrating erotica or sexual fantasy into AI companions or LLMs, VR, AR, or sex tech, you need the only person who has ever mapped the structure of fantasy itself, discovered the universal grammar of desire, individual desire signatures, and how to practically work with the full spectrum of sexual desire in ethical and effective ways.
Artemisia de Vine was the first to map the structural engine beneath sexual fantasies, identify why humans have them, and creating a method for mapping a person’s unique desire signature. This breakthrough allows AI to generate infinite, ethical, satisfying new expressions of that signature in practice.
Tech keeps reducing people’s turn-ons to click data, physical appearance, sex acts, role-play tropes, and power dynamics. Neuroscientists are celebrating cognitive intimacy tracking and neurofeedback. That’s all part of the picture — but it’s not what actually excites or satisfies us and it doesn't show us how to safely navigate people's spicy preferences: from the romantic to the taboo.
It’s not just what someone looks like that turns us on — it’s the story about what they look like that flicks the switch. More than that: the exact story that activates that person’s unique desire signature. Both real life sex and fantasy erotica gets hot when the three paradoxes of desire are activated. It gets both safe and satisfying when those paradoxes are handled well. Desire literacy shows you how to work with that structure at operational depth.
Desire literacy shows that Erotica is just the doorway. The real stakes are how AI interprets human longing, bonding, projection, attachment, and meaning-making — all of which run on the same fantasy architecture.

What this means for AI-human resonance
The deVinery Method gives AI builders the first-ever grammar for erotic intelligence, making possible everything from desire-responsive systems to safe, ethical intimacy engines for humans and machines.
Sexual fantasy contains the source code of all human desire allowing us to track user's unique desire signature inside and outside the bedroom — the raw structure of all human motivation, relationality, resonance, making it possible for AI to learn and engage it in all conversations, not just the spicy ones. The implications of this alone are staggering.
What AI teams are trying to solve — and desire literacy can do.
AI teams are trying to solve very important ethical and technical problems by asking the wrong questions.
Every technical challenge they’re wrestling with in erotica and intimacy design — drift, fixation, boundary bleed, parasocial escalation, taboo-content triggering, fantasy literalisation — all come from the same root:
They don’t know the structure of sexual fantasy because no one ever mapped it until now. This is where The deVinery Method changes everything.
It is the first system that can reliably distinguish:
-
fantasy harm vs actual harm
-
taboo vs danger
-
kink vs coercion
-
erotic bonding vs obsession
-
intensity vs risk
-
roleplay vs pathology
With Desire Literacy, you don’t have to choose.
You can build systems where:
-
users are safe
-
expression is free
-
boundaries are coherent
-
intensity is held
-
desire is understood instead of amputated
Who this is for
If your job title looks anything like:
-
Head of AI Safety
-
Chief Trust & Safety Officer
-
Director of Policy
-
Lead Research Scientist
-
Companionship AI Product Lead
-
XR Intimacy Architect
-
VP of AI / CTO
-
Founder of a sex tech company
-
Policy Advisor on digital intimacy
-
Alignment researcher handling LLM behaviour
-
Head of Ethics & Governance
-
UX designer for affective computing
-
Architect of AI companions / virtual characters
What the deVinery Method offers:
Artemisia doesn't engineer your systems for you. She teaches you desire literacy, so your systems can finally be engineered coherently. This is not about erotic content moderation. It’s about understanding the architecture of desire itself so we can build ethically resonant systems.
1. Erotic AI Safety & Alignment Consulting (High-Level Advisory)
For AI labs, platform governance teams, and multimodal model designers.
I work directly with leadership, safety teams, and product strategists to:
-
design erotic-safe alignment protocols
-
build desire-literate taxonomy & content models
-
develop frameworks for parasocial safety and healthy attachment
-
solve NSFW/SFW boundary collisions
-
prevent erotic drift without crippling expression
-
articulate what “cognitive intimacy” actually is
-
give your models a coherent stance on fantasy vs reality
This is not content moderation.
This is architectural intelligence.
2. Fantasy-Responsive Systems & Companion Design
For teams building:
-
AI companions
-
VR/AR intimacy experiences
-
synthetic relationship platforms
-
adult apps
-
character-based LLMs
-
narrative erotica engines
Map the desire signatures of your user archetypes and design systems that:
-
respond ethically
-
adapt without escalating risk
-
deepen connection without dependency
-
evoke erotic intelligence without destabilising users
-
allow controlled taboo exploration without harm
You get the safest version and the most satisfying version.
Because safety and satisfaction come from the same root:
Understanding desire.
3. Org-Level Strategy: Erotic Content, Safety & Innovation
For C-suite, founders, and heads of R&D.
I bring:
-
strategic clarity on erotic content
-
frameworks for policy, governance & trust
-
a roadmap for integrating desire literacy across products
-
a way to finally neutralise the cultural panic around sex & AI
-
tools for platform-level coherence
-
third-flip metacognition for leadership
You get a competitive advantage no one else has.
The Rosetta Stone of Desire
Desire Signature Modelling Support (The Core)
Every human has a unique desire signature — the underlying pattern of how their erotic psyche navigates the three paradoxes of desire. This signature is stable across all content, all relationships, all contexts, all lifetimes.
It is the engine beneath every fantasy, every preference, every arousal spike, every kink, every roleplay, every unconscious behavioural loop.
Artemisia provides the architecture your datasets must be built around so you stop capturing aesthetic fluff and start capturing the actual engine of desire.
This is the foundation of all erotic alignment work, all intimacy design, all cognitive intimacy mapping, all NSFW/SFW coherence modelling, and all parasocial prevention.
This core reframe paves the way to ask the right questions and unleash a cascade of problem solving.
• Erotic Alignment
So your models can respond to erotic content without collapsing into harm, flatness, moral panic, or incoherence.
• Desire-Literate Taxonomy Foundations
Not taxonomies themselves — the grammar you need to build coherent classification systems, safety layers, and generative rules internally.
• Sexual Fantasy Structural Analysis
So your team finally understands why users ask for the things they ask for, and how fantasy actually behaves under constraint.
• Boundary Safety and Consent Logic Input
You already have engineers.
I give you the pattern logic of how consent, power, taboo, and turn-on actually operate so you can finally model them.
• Erotic Drift Diagnostics
You can’t prevent drift if you don’t know why drift happens.
I map the mechanics so you can design for it intentionally.
• Cognitive Intimacy Interpretation
Neuroscience can measure intensity — I tell you what the structure of that intensity is.
• NSFW/SFW Boundary Coherence
Not moderation — conceptual clarity:
why boundaries collapse, how to design non-fragile ones, and how fantasy naturally crosses them.
• Erotic User-Interaction Contexting
Why users role-play the way they do
Why intensity spikes
Why taboo themes arise and how to ethically engage them
Why AI safety rules often create the very behaviors you’re trying to suppress.
Work with Artemisia de Vine:
Desire Literacy & Erotic Intelligence Architect
Founder, The deVinery Method
If your team is responsible for AI alignment, intimacy design, or any system that touches erotic content, this is where you begin.
The deVinery Method is an intellectually protected, proprietary framework. Full-scale integration requires a licensing agreement — and all engagements begin with direct consultation.
Artemisia works exclusively with leadership and safety teams who need a coherent, desire-literate foundation before making high-stakes decisions.
If you’re building in this domain — and you need it to be ethical, effective, and technically grounded — Request an Executive Orientation — the prerequisite for any licensing or integration work.



